Assume nothing. Test everything.
Offensive Security is where claims meet evidence — networks, applications, wireless, source code, AI systems, and people, tested by practitioners who know how attackers actually operate. Every engagement ends with findings ranked by real exploitability and fixes your team can act on.
Common assets we test
Every engagement below is scoped around the assets that matter to you. These are the ones we test most.
Public-facing apps tested against the OWASP Top 10, access control between roles and tenants, and the business logic scanners miss.
APIsAuthentication, authorization, and abuse paths across REST and GraphQL services — and the data sitting behind them.
Mobile applicationsiOS and Android apps, from the unauthenticated attack surface through reverse engineering of the shipped binary.
Networks & hostsInternal and external infrastructure, worked manually into real attack paths rather than scanner output.
Cloud environmentsAttack paths through cloud identities, workloads, and configuration across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
WirelessWi-Fi, Bluetooth, and the rest of the radio edge, tested from the range an attacker would actually use.
AI & LLM featuresPrompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, agent abuse — the attack surface AI features create.
People & premisesPhishing, pretexting, and physical access — the human layer, measured honestly and trained afterward.
RF & embedded systemsProprietary radio protocols, IoT devices, and access-control hardware operating outside standard Wi-Fi.
Facilities & access controlBadge systems, entry points, and guard response, tested the way an intruder would approach them.
Penetration Testing
A real attacker’s view of your network — before a real attacker gets one.
Our testers work your internal and external networks the way an adversary would: manually, patiently, and chaining small weaknesses into real attack paths rather than pasting scanner output into a template. Every finding comes with the path we took, the impact it enables, and a fix that addresses the cause rather than the symptom. Retesting is part of the engagement, so closed means verified closed.
- Internal & external network
- Manual exploitation
- Attack-path mapping
- Verification retest included
Read moreRead less
Testing options
- General penetration testing — scoping, authorization & rules of engagement
- External Network Penetration Testing
- Internal network penetration testing
- Vulnerability assessment (scanning baseline)
- Active Directory & identity infrastructure review
- Network Segmentation Testing
- System Hardening Penetration Testing
- Insider-threat scenarios
- Physical access scenarios, where in scope
Who does the testing
Every engagement is delivered by our own senior testers rather than subcontracted out, holding OSCP and beyond (OSWE, OSWP, OSEE, CEH Master among them), and roughly 98% of the work is manual. Scanners establish the baseline; people find the attack paths.
Standards & compliance
Methodology follows PTES and OSSTMM with findings mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, and engagements can be scoped to satisfy specific obligations — PCI DSS testing requirements, cyber-insurance questionnaires, or a customer’s security review.
Web Application Testing
Your applications, tested the way they will be attacked.
Web applications carry your most direct exposure: they are public, they hold data, and they change every sprint. We test them against the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and beyond — authentication and session handling, access control between tenants and roles, injection, and the business-logic flaws no scanner will ever flag. Findings are written for the developers who have to fix them, not just the executives who have to read them.
- OWASP WSTG methodology
- AuthN / AuthZ & session testing
- Business-logic abuse
- Developer-ready findings
Read moreRead less
What's included
- Web Application Penetration Testing — full OWASP WSTG coverage and the flaws beyond it
- API testing & business-logic abuse
- Mobile Application Penetration Testing (iOS & Android)
- Authentication, session & token handling
- Multi-tenant & role-based access control testing
- Proof-of-concept exploitation & penetration testing retest
How findings arrive
Each finding carries a working proof of concept, the business impact it enables, and remediation guidance written for the developers who own the code. Where the application warrants it, testing pairs with Secure Code Review — behaviour observed from outside, cause confirmed in the source.
Wireless / Wi-Fi Testing
The perimeter you forgot you have.
Wireless networks quietly extend your perimeter into the parking lot, and misconfigurations there rarely show up in any other assessment. We evaluate your corporate and guest networks for weak authentication, poor segmentation, and rogue access points, and test how far an attacker within radio range could actually get. You learn precisely where the wireless edge leaks into the wired core.
- Corporate & guest Wi-Fi
- Rogue AP detection
- Segmentation testing
- Radio-range attack scenarios
Read moreRead less
What's included
- Wireless Penetration Testing — corporate & guest network assessment (802.1X)
- Encryption & authentication control testing
- Rogue access point & evil-twin simulation
- Signal leakage & perimeter exposure mapping
- Bluetooth, Zigbee & other wireless protocols
- Internet of Things (IoT) Penetration Testing
- Segmentation testing from wireless to wired core
The engagement answers a concrete question: from radio range — the lobby, the parking lot, the floor below — how far into your environment can an attacker actually get, and would anything notice them on the way?
Secure Code Review
Find the flaws scanners can’t see.
Some vulnerabilities only exist in the source: subtle authorization gaps, cryptographic misuse, trust assumptions between services. Our reviewers read your code the way a skilled attacker with a stolen repository would, combining tooling with human judgment about what the code is actually trying to do. It pairs naturally with web application testing — one confirms the behaviour, the other explains it.
- Manual source review
- Framework & crypto misuse
- Authorization logic
- Pairs with Web App Testing
Read moreRead less
What's included
- Manual review of security-critical paths
- SAST, DAST, SCA & IAST tooling across the SDLC
- Third-party library & dependency risk review
- Cryptography & secrets-handling review
- Authorization & trust-boundary analysis
- Developer walkthrough of every finding
The output is remediation guidance developers can apply directly — insecure patterns named, safer idioms shown — plus secure-development recommendations that stop the same class of flaw from being written twice.
AI / LLM Testing
The attack surface your AI features just created — tested.
Every model wired into your product brings failure modes no traditional test covers: prompts that override instructions, retrieval pipelines that leak documents, agents with more authority than anyone intended. We attack AI systems the way adversaries already do — prompt injection, jailbreaks, data extraction, tool and integration abuse — and report what actually gave way, ranked by impact. It pairs naturally with AI Advisory: that line governs the risk on paper; this one proves where it lives in production.
- Prompt injection & jailbreaks
- Data leakage & RAG testing
- Agent & tool abuse
- OWASP LLM Top 10
Read moreRead less
What's included
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Application Penetration Testing
- Prompt-injection & jailbreak testing — direct & indirect
- Sensitive-data extraction & training-leakage probes
- RAG pipeline & document-boundary testing
- Agent, plugin & tool-integration abuse
- Machine Learning (ML) Red Team Assessment
- Guardrail & content-filter bypass evaluation
Methodology
Testing follows the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and MITRE ATLAS, adapted to the system in front of us — chatbots, copilots, retrieval-augmented search, or autonomous agents. Where the question is governance rather than exploitability, the work hands off to AI Advisory on the Advisory line.
Adversarial Emulation / Red Team
A full-scope rehearsal against a determined adversary.
A red-team engagement asks a bigger question than any single test: given a realistic adversary with time and intent, does your organization detect them, contain them, and recover? We emulate relevant threat actors across technical, physical, and human vectors against agreed objectives, while your defenders respond as they would on any other day. The debrief maps every step we took to what your controls saw — and what they missed.
- Objective-based engagements
- Threat-actor emulation
- Detection & response validation
- Executive debrief
Read moreRead less
Engagement formats
- Adversary Emulation Exercise
- Persistent Adversary Emulation Exercise
- Red Team / Blue Team Exercise
- Red Team / Blue Team Exercise with Strategic Process Review
- Internal Red Team Exercise
- Insider Threat Exercise
- Blue Team Enhancement
- Security Controls Validation
- Penetration Testing Retest
- Overt, covert or blended execution models
Building your team’s capability
Red Team Education Services give your SOC and IT teams hands-on training in adversary tradecraft, detection engineering, and response playbook development, so lessons from each exercise become permanent capability rather than a one-time report.
How an operation unfolds
Engagements follow the full attack lifecycle — reconnaissance, initial compromise, foothold, privilege escalation, lateral movement, persistence, and objective — with every technique mapped to MITRE ATT&CK so the debrief lines up your controls against exactly what was attempted.
When organizations run one
Typically after major technology change or a cloud migration, and ahead of regulatory reviews, cyber-insurance assessments, or board reporting — anywhere defensible proof of detection and response effectiveness is worth more than another scan report.
RF RedOps Services
Attack the radio layer no scanner can see.
Beyond Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, most environments run on radio protocols nobody has tested: badge readers, industrial remotes, proprietary IoT links, vehicle and drone telemetry. Our RF operators capture, analyze, and replay these signals the way an attacker with an SDR and time would, exposing weak encryption, replay vulnerabilities, and unauthorized access paths that live entirely outside the wired network.
- Signal capture & protocol reverse engineering
- Replay & relay attack simulation
- RFID / access-badge cloning tests
- IoT & industrial radio assessment
Read moreRead less
What's included
- RF signal capture, decoding & protocol analysis (SDR-based)
- Replay, relay & jamming attack simulation
- RFID and proximity badge cloning assessment
- Proprietary and industrial radio protocol testing
- Drone and UAV telemetry security testing
- Findings mapped to physical and network impact
Who does the testing
Delivered by the same senior offensive team behind our wireless and IoT testing, using dedicated SDR and RF tooling rather than commodity Wi-Fi scanners.
Physical Security Assessment
If someone can walk in, so can an attacker.
Digital controls mean little if the front door doesn’t hold. We test physical access controls, badge systems, and guard response the way a real intruder would — tailgating, lock bypass, badge cloning, and social pretexting — then hand back a report your facilities and security teams can act on together.
- Tailgating & unauthorized entry
- Badge & lock bypass testing
- Guard & response validation
- Facilities-ready findings
Read moreRead less
What's included
- Perimeter and entry-point assessment
- Tailgating and social-pretext entry attempts
- Badge cloning & lock/access-control bypass testing
- Guard response and escalation validation
- Server room, data centre & restricted-area access testing
- Combined physical-to-network pivot scenarios, where in scope
How it pairs
Physical Security Assessments pair naturally with Social Engineering and Red Team engagements, where physical access is one leg of a broader objective-based operation.
Social Engineering
Test the human layer — then train it.
Most incidents still begin with a person, so we test yours honestly: phishing and pretext campaigns built from what an attacker could actually learn about your organization, measured without shaming anyone. The results feed directly into security awareness training that reflects the attacks your people genuinely face, not generic e-learning. Measurement, then improvement, then measurement again.
Read moreRead less
Campaign types
The awareness program behind it
Testing without training just measures the same failure twice. Our awareness program runs a five-phase cycle — analyze, prepare, deploy, measure, optimize — with role-based training content, simulations tuned to what your people actually see, and risk scoring that shows the trend by team and topic rather than a single blended click rate.